It’s been explained numerous a time in advance of, but we are not able to sleepwalk into a rugged roughshod state of CCTV viewing our every single go, but us not having the ability to enjoy them back. It’s disconcerting obviously…
@ anna – absolutely nothing in creating from Kent Police nevertheless. They’ve verbally informed me which they’re looking for to wrap up their preliminary investigation early future week. The IPCC wrote to me to confirm the grievance were referred to them and they experienced made a decision it was a make any difference for Kent to analyze.
A different pertinent write-up, although I had not heard about the initial incident. Two a long time looks a somewhat long time to get a response, While Alex’s criticism was dealt with in a fairly well timed manner, Maybe as it was extra severe, by having an real arrest concerned.
I agree with much with the comment currently made about law enforcement in excess of response, and that they probably above reacted with a reason. However the detail that has not nonetheless been examined may be the purpose with the initial unidentified Medway Council team.
You seem such as the worst sort of idiot to me. The Original officer was severe and Incorrect I concur. You will need to realise that when 1 law enforcement officer begins something on the other hand foolish or mistaken it may be, and Enable’s be truthful The everyday policeman isn't the brightest, it must be followed up properly. All people helps make blunder and has poor times etc and once you’re in a career with general public obligation your errors may cause disruption.
Of course you are able to see where All of this may very well be heading? That at some point you will need a licence as a way to function a camera. And naturally Yet another good little tax earner to mps salaries and bills and second homes.
Being an American, I’ve constantly viewed Wonderful Britain as a bit of police condition, even worse than what we experienced right here when George W. Bush was President. At least listed here, you might take images inside of a general public put with no being accosted by the law enforcement or have a surveillance digital camera adhering to your every shift…
Yes you have a ideal to get illustrations or photos of properties as long as you are not on non-public home (dont even imagine taking photographs of Navy web sites in Medway … Dumb issue to do.
I have lived by means of and survived in excess of forty decades of Energetic terrorism threats in britain and hope to continue to do so. Empowering an enormous Military of ‘protection’ people to enforce / go after their Variation of British isles regulation isn't a value I'm prepared to fork out in the title of terror prevention.
I am a author and photographer who's got performed plenty of Road photography previously. Fortunately I haven't been topic to police harrassment when taking photographs, but I understand that this sort of law enforcement behaviour has grown to be oppressively prevalent in the last handful of years.
Bloody hell, if that been in another counrty, the british govenment could well be stating that it unfair and unjust legislation, but appears to be Alright below. Totally free state or police condition?
Police don't have any electricity to delete pictures or demand from customers they be deleted. That should be decided by a court docket get. I thought that law enforcement had to obtain “realistic suspicion” to implement section 44.
My authentic worry is, if I develop into the sufferer of crime who do I get in touch with as the Regulation isn't represented equitably with the Law enforcement and I am not availed protection either from criminal offense or Law enforcement and the two are click here hard to differentiate for my part.
@ Catkins – You’re spot on inside your Examination. The point regarding the shoes was made in your case. It’s only one compact Element of the whole episode. With regards to your press; any journalist wanting to do a Tale relating to this can without any additional term from me. All the details are by now in the public area. They only want to use the rules of reasonable use and editorial remark. However additional comment from me may add an element of emotion and and insert a personal facet to it I’m not thinking about that over and above what’s available through the post and everyones remarks listed here. Moreover I do think little in the media in any case. It will be a tiny bit hypocritical of me to go jogging to them now. I'll remark additional After i receive the response from Kent law enforcement. You will find there's approach I would like to follow. I get you will discover other ways to go about this.